the freaks come out

2003.03.09 8.43

I just received what has to be the most psycho email message I have ever received. I know that there are creepies, nakies, and wackos out there. Now one of them has written me. The only messages he has ever posted that I could find regarded dissing someone who posted in the paranormal newsgroup, a message about the gold edition of Age of Empires with the expansion included (Conquerors!) and two empty test messages he posted in alt.food.mexican-cooking. GO TO ALT.TEST TO POST TEST MESSAGES YOU NEWBIE TWIT!

Here is psycho boy's deluded email as well as my response. Honestly it is unreasonable to think I can get through to someone as sick as this person is, but I figured, what the hell.

From: "Jim61" <knightowl7@earthlink.net>
Subject: Hello, Super Genius
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 02:14:03 -0800

George Bush is an errand boy for wealth, primarly focused in England. In effect he and others have reversed the effort in the revolutionary war. The collection of people he works for, are uninsipired idiots as evidenced by thier pawn in George. If they were smarter, they would've groomed an individual like Ronald Reagan for the Oval office.

First off, your email is a grammatical atrocity. The comma splice between ''he works for'' and ''are uninspired idiots'' -- WTF do you need a pause there for? So you can breath into your inhaler and take another swig of sugar water? Your rant is poorly constructed on a sadly consistent level. I'd rate it at a ninth grade reading level, although I suspect I am being too generous.

Your observation that cooperation between the UK and US equals a primary focus in England is deluded. You must be joking. Do you realize how many years we've had a strong financial relationship with the UK? It started before W and your mysterious ''Others'' were in diapers. Get your facts straight. Just because you see George and Tony on the TV agreeing with each other doesn't mean that it equates the notion that they are reversing the US gains of the revolutionary war. I believe we'd have to start paying England some back-taxes, as well as returning their colonies in order to do anything that even remotely resembles ''reversing the effort.'' Religious freedom was one of the gains of that war, too, brainiac, and I could not fathom any US leader EVER backing down on that point. Your argument is crap.

The Iraq situation and the planes plowing into the skyscraper are a compete fraud. Nothing about is is outside the power of the US government, as it is currently.

Riiiiight. Nothing outside the power of Hollywood, either. Sounds like you have a problem distinguishing between reality and fiction. Could this be why you were were hoping the ''uninspired idiots'' were to groom a Ronald Reagon type president? Why? So he could entertain you? What's that? You like Reagan because he's funny? Maybe I got this all wrong 'cause I'm a little confused. What do you mean he's funny? Like the way he talks? "No, no, like the way Reagon tell stories, you know?" No I don't know! You said it. He makes you laugh? Is he a clown? Does he amuse you? Is he a clown here to amuse you!? "No, no." Then HOW is he funny? What is so funny about Reagan? Tell me! Tell me right now!!!

Osama bin Laden is an employee of George Bush's family, they've made each other millions of dollars. Periodic releases of warnings of possible Terrorist activity and targets have one thread in common, nothing ever happens. Because as a financial effort the terrorists do not exist. Any evidence of thier activites since 9-11 would be the direct creation of the US government to deceive the USA.

I am pretty much dumbfounded at how you managed to have such a convoluted view of the relationship between world figures. So, first you're saying Tony Blair and Bush collude to return financial wealth taken 200+ years ago to the UK, and now you're telling me George is also Osama's boss. Man, George is pretty busy! Last time I checked he was also running the White House -- all on a 7 hour work day! You say you want to see evidence in the form of a terrorist act whenever the terror level is raised, and yet you claimed earlier that the US goverment powered the 9-11 attack. So, why can't they ''orchestrate'' an attack whenever they raise the threat level? BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT ISN'T CAUSING THE ATTACKS! Geez. Obviously 2 plus 2 does not equal 4 in your case. How many voices are in your head, anyway? Come back when you've got a quorum.

They have a stranglehold on the media and are relying on this to continue the deception.

While I agree that Al Qaeda has a stranglehold on Al Jazeera, getting them to broadcast whatever propoganda they see fit, I'm afraid I must disagree with you about the media here in the United States. Unless you've been living under a rock you will find that almost all of the mainstream media are staffed by liberally minded folks who would like nothing better than to see George Bush fall on his ass. This isn't to say they didn't want to see Clinton fall on his ass because controversy sells! The media are third-party objectivists and are not affiliated with any political office. You should know that. So, to follow up again, you're now saying Bush, Blair, Osama, and The Free Press are in cahoots. Okay. And monkeys might fly out of my butt!

Thier power and influence is so great that I sleep well every night, knowing that if this is the best that they can do, we have nothing to fear. All we need do is focus the efforts to keep the information channels clear and free on the internet, and it does not matter what they do. Power is shfting away from objective centers and toward individual responsibility. Very quickly they will become empty formality.

Not really. When you say ''All WE need do is focus...'' are you referring to a group of people -- or to the collective of personalities floating in your brain? The idea that the internet will replace George, Tony and Osama's good buddy The Media is years off, if ever. Oh, and how are YOU keeping the information channels clear and free on the internet, exactly? Could the Constitution of the United States, guaranteeing free speech be to blame? Why don't you find a plunger and apply it to the side of your head. You will surely find something trapped there.

The military will have it's largest problem with abandonment. People will be seeing the peace effort as being more courageous than the war effort. Regardless of the size and influence of objective power structures, they will all become emasculated to a faint voice that is heard everywhere.

Will that voice be heard even louder in your noggin? The military have been trained to kill. Once we go to war you will only see Iraqi deserters who would rather give up than die in support of Saddam and his inhuman imperialistic policies. I'm impressed that you used the word emasculated. Good for you! That's where my ninth grade assessment of the tepid scrawl that you call writing came from, by the way. Unfortunately, your final driving point is that the military will become a faint voice that is heard everywhere. What? If it is a faint voice, it *won't* be heard anywhere. It has to be a loud voice to be heard everywhere. See? Proof reading is very important, jackass.

The next 20 years will be the most intresting period in human history. Miracles will surpass and embarass both science and religion's expectations so that neither will show their face anywhere and expect credibility. What was fiction will become the patterns for the future.

This is how you're ending your rant with me? You have hope for the future? What about the Bush-Blair-Osama-Press-Military connection? What about the internet killing the media? Will Cyndi Lauper ever put out another hit album? Where are the answers?! Why must I be surrounded by FRICKIN' IDIOTS!!!! Either you got too disinterested in your own incomprehensive drivel, or your Ritalin is finally kicking in. Go back to playing Age of Empires and come back when you've grown a frontal lobe.